I think there are many sites that write high-quality articles

Minhazi862

Every day, but updating old pages rather than creating new pages is a good way to improve quality. In this article, Neil Patel explains measures to update past articles using actual data. This is a very interesting article as it reveals the details of the measures that were actually taken. How much of the traffic to your site does the top 10 pages account for? It's probably a fairly large percentage. Please see the screenshot below. In the case of my site, the top 10 pages account for 28.7% of the total traffic. It's probably not that high of a number. However, my site has 5,441 blog articles posted. In other words, 0.1% of pages generate 28.7% of all search traffic . Especially for small sites, the top 10 pages tend to account for a large portion of the site's overall search traffic.

What does this situation mean? Should I just focus on the top 10 pages and ignore the others? Or should we focus on ways to mechanically mass-produce new content ? table of contents quality trumps quantity Find pages that were previously rated Investigate content that has never been rated highly by Google India Phone Number Prioritize improvement measures How to update old content User metrics Don't forget to promote again Don't forget about (white) link building Conclusion: Spend time updating old content quality trumps quantity I used to believe that the more the better. They were churning out new content every week.





There was a time when I published two articles in one day. Over time, search traffic to my site grew. However, the increase was not that large. I was spending a lot of time writing blog posts, but I noticed that a lot of the content I published rarely ranked well. So what did I do? I decided to focus on older, obsolete content to drive search traffic. The specific work is as follows. Every week, I tried to publish one article of new content. However, I had my team update 23 pieces of outdated content on average.